Jump to content

DSP regarding Historic Landmarks


rewyanc2k

Recommended Posts

I noticed on one of the applications where it asks if the Distillery will be located in a building that is on the register of historic landmarks. Can anyone tell me why they ask this and what the implications of that are. We are looking to put our operation into a building that currently has an application in to be added to the National Register of Historic Places. I am trying to figure out if that delineation is going to hurt or help us in the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is historic and so registered, the issuance of the DSP will be far more difficult. You will have to involve several more government agencies and the time added is exponential. I speak from experience.

If it is not so registered at the time of application, then say NO and get it done before it becomes one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is historic and so registered, the issuance of the DSP will be far more difficult. You will have to involve several more government agencies and the time added is exponential. I speak from experience.

If it is not so registered at the time of application, then say NO and get it done before it becomes one.

Mash,

so here is my issue, the foot traffic at this location is probably 8-10X what it would be at any other location I am considering. so by difficult, do you mean not worth it even if my tasting room and on site sales would be 8-10X greater in that location. and do the Fed's look at the permit application differently, as far as operations, layout, etc... I'm still not understanding exactly what is different about a historic location other than you have another agency looking at the application. We aren't making any modifications to the exterior of the building.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have advised people to run from buildings that are eligible for historic status, but that advice is certainly not etched in stone. It is tempered with an admonition that before one runs, one should consider the value of the location.

Whether to run or not should be a business decision. As you point out, locating in a building that is eligible for, or has been listed as, a national historic monument can certainly be an “asset” worth purchasing with the investment of your time.

I might even learn to do a backflip if someone promised me eight to ten times the business out the door.

The important point is that you are not bared from establishing a DSP in such a location. I am not an expert in this matter, but here is what I think I know about it. It will give you a basis of asking your questions to persons who purport to be experts, and they are easy to find on almost any subject.

· The NHRP is the official list of the Nation's historic places worthy of preservation.

· The National Register is administered by the National Park Service under the Secretary of the Interior.

· According to the NPS - Owners [of property on the NRHP] can do anything they wish with their property provided that no Federal license, permit, or funding is involved.

That brings us to a potential giant “whoops.” If you want to be a DSP, then a federal permit is involved. On the other hand, you may not be the owner of the property. Where does this leave you?

Here is what TTB says about its involvement in the issue.

· Any Federal agency which authorizes activities which may impact on properties included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places is responsible for evaluating the nature of the impact and reporting its finding to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.

· Since the TTB issues permits … which may affect construction or use of historic properties, we must take the potential impact on such activities into account when considering whether to authorize such activities.

That is a statement of what they are required to do. But what do they actually do? I don’t know, but let’s look at their further advice on the matter:

· If your proposed premises are included in or eligible for inclusion in the NRHP and you plan to make any changes to construction or use of those premises, we strongly recommend that you contact your State Historic Preservation Office early in the planning process, and follow state guidelines. Failure to do so may result in delay of your permit or registry, or request for additional changes to your premises.

The emphasis is mine. Note that TTB does not say that you must contact the State Historic Preservation Officer. They “strongly recommend” instead.

Also note that TTB does not say, in this bit of advice, “We are going to evaluate your project and reporting our findings to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.” It does not say, "We will take the construction required or the use into consideration when it decides whether to approve your application.” It instead strongly recommends that you do that.

I have not been involved in such an application, but I recall from my past life, that they simply made note of the fact and let the appropriate agencies do the heavy lifting. In that regard, if you look at the "other required documents" that you must submit with the application to register the DSP, there is no mention of requiring, as a part of the application, any further information if you state that the premises is eligible for consideration, etc. Also note that when you check the "yes" box on the question on the permit application form, they do not provide any link to further explanations they will require if you answer yes, as they do in many cases. I conclude that they do not want the information because they will do nothing with it. Do I know that? No I don't.

That does not mean that you should just check yes and go blithely on your way.

Somewhere there is someone, in some office, who has some power, who does care. That someone, whether it is TTB or another agency, may step in with a long list of requirements.

That said, it sounds as if you may be locating within a building that someone else has proposed to list on the national historic register. So here is some perhaps obvious advice. Begin by talking with them the persons who are developing the project. If they have applied for historic status, they will probably have employed an architect who understands the rules and who is guiding them through the process. Someone has probably been in contact with all of the appropriate agencies. If they are converting the building to commercial space, they will probably have sought answers to the questions that potential tenants may ask.

Finally, while I’m not an attorney, you might ask one whether you should include, in the lease, an escape clause in case someone who has the power to approve denies the use of the premises as a DSP or makes it just too darned expensive to consider. That is good advice in general, which may be confirmed by anyone who has had a go around with the local fire marshal, wetlands preservation people, or water authorities.

So my advice is, “Don’t run.” Check first, and then see if, the facts in your very particular case, you think running is the correct business decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have advised people to run from buildings that are eligible for historic status, but that advice is certainly not etched in stone. It is tempered with an admonition that before one runs, one should consider the value of the location.

Whether to run or not should be a business decision. As you point out, locating in a building that is eligible for, or has been listed as, a national historic monument can certainly be an “asset” worth purchasing with the investment of your time.

I might even learn to do a backflip if someone promised me eight to ten times the business out the door.

The important point is that you are not bared from establishing a DSP in such a location. I am not an expert in this matter, but here is what I think I know about it. It will give you a basis of asking your questions to persons who purport to be experts, and they are easy to find on almost any subject.

· The NHRP is the official list of the Nation's historic places worthy of preservation.

· The National Register is administered by the National Park Service under the Secretary of the Interior.

· According to the NPS - Owners [of property on the NRHP] can do anything they wish with their property provided that no Federal license, permit, or funding is involved.

That brings us to a potential giant “whoops.” If you want to be a DSP, then a federal permit is involved. On the other hand, you may not be the owner of the property. Where does this leave you?

Here is what TTB says about its involvement in the issue.

· Any Federal agency which authorizes activities which may impact on properties included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places is responsible for evaluating the nature of the impact and reporting its finding to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.

· Since the TTB issues permits … which may affect construction or use of historic properties, we must take the potential impact on such activities into account when considering whether to authorize such activities.

That is a statement of what they are required to do. But what do they actually do? I don’t know, but let’s look at their further advice on the matter:

· If your proposed premises are included in or eligible for inclusion in the NRHP and you plan to make any changes to construction or use of those premises, we strongly recommend that you contact your State Historic Preservation Office early in the planning process, and follow state guidelines. Failure to do so may result in delay of your permit or registry, or request for additional changes to your premises.

The emphasis is mine. Note that TTB does not say that you must contact the State Historic Preservation Officer. They “strongly recommend” instead.

Also note that TTB does not say, in this bit of advice, “We are going to evaluate your project and reporting our findings to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.” It does not say, "We will take the construction required or the use into consideration when it decides whether to approve your application.” It instead strongly recommends that you do that.

I have not been involved in such an application, but I recall from my past life, that they simply made note of the fact and let the appropriate agencies do the heavy lifting. In that regard, if you look at the "other required documents" that you must submit with the application to register the DSP, there is no mention of requiring, as a part of the application, any further information if you state that the premises is eligible for consideration, etc. Also note that when you check the "yes" box on the question on the permit application form, they do not provide any link to further explanations they will require if you answer yes, as they do in many cases. I conclude that they do not want the information because they will do nothing with it. Do I know that? No I don't.

That does not mean that you should just check yes and go blithely on your way.

Somewhere there is someone, in some office, who has some power, who does care. That someone, whether it is TTB or another agency, may step in with a long list of requirements.

That said, it sounds as if you may be locating within a building that someone else has proposed to list on the national historic register. So here is some perhaps obvious advice. Begin by talking with them the persons who are developing the project. If they have applied for historic status, they will probably have employed an architect who understands the rules and who is guiding them through the process. Someone has probably been in contact with all of the appropriate agencies. If they are converting the building to commercial space, they will probably have sought answers to the questions that potential tenants may ask.

Finally, while I’m not an attorney, you might ask one whether you should include, in the lease, an escape clause in case someone who has the power to approve denies the use of the premises as a DSP or makes it just too darned expensive to consider. That is good advice in general, which may be confirmed by anyone who has had a go around with the local fire marshal, wetlands preservation people, or water authorities.

So my advice is, “Don’t run.” Check first, and then see if, the facts in your very particular case, you think running is the correct business decision.

DH:

Thank you for that very detailed response, great info. I am going to talk with the architect about this now and get an opinion from our attorney as well. I just wanted to have some background before i did so. So you have been a great help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...