grehorst Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 email message received by Bill Owens... I've gotten the green light to develop a recommended short form for the small distiller. Can you call me this week to provide input. I'm thinking under 10,000 pg's production per year as a top range. Also, I would appreciate input as to how many types of spirits to report. I do want to talk about disposition for non-beverage. If the Distiller wants to sell spirits for other than beverage, they probably will not qualify for a short filing? DAVE BATEMAN DISTILLED SPIRITS INDUSTRY ANALYST 202-302-3859 816-623-9405 FAX 816-623-9405 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DISTILLERnhas Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 For what it's worth. The amendment to the current law in Michigan has included a definition of a "small distiller" as a producer of less than 60,000 proof gallons per year. Just FYI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grehorst Posted July 21, 2008 Author Share Posted July 21, 2008 For what it's worth. The amendment to the current law in Michigan has included a definition of a "small distiller" as a producer of less than 60,000 proof gallons per year. Just FYI I think that's a much more workable number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgpoff Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 I think that's a much more workable number. Ditto! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Linneman Posted July 23, 2008 Share Posted July 23, 2008 I think easier forms are a great idea - Also agree with the higher proof gallon limits below Fred Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grehorst Posted August 26, 2008 Author Share Posted August 26, 2008 I emailed Dave Bateman requesting that the upper limit for small producers be increased to 60,000P.G.- I suggest others also email or call him on this matter.... His email is dave.bateman@ttb.gov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
will Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 The real question is "what's the cost in regulation that is saved by simplified reporting?" That has to be the TTB's internal view. Based on that, 75,000 pg is just over $1mm - probably a useful number. Other way to arrive at a useful value: How many companies are regulated by the spirits group in the US? Graph them against their tax liability, biggest on the left. Draw a line to the right of the knee in the curve. How much spirit is that? I'm guessing it's around 500,000 pg. $6.75mm tax liability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delaware_phoenix Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 I'm curious about exactly what you're looking at Guy as far as changed reporting. Is this for the tax returns, monthly production reports, quarterly inventory? All of the above? I just got my Federal permit and am beginning to work with the various reporting mechanisms. So I don't have any experience with them at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomastew Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 For us, the most beneficial item would be reporting quarterly vs. monthly. We received this benefit for our brewing operation a few years ago and it has been fantastic. The TTB allowed brewers making less that 60,000 bbls/year to qualify for the paperwork reduction. It has always appeared to me that the TTB is most concerned with collecting and being able to predict revenue. At the current level a 60,000bbl brewer might be expected to report around $105,000.00 ($7x15,000) of tax liability per quarter. A distiller with the same type of quarterly tax liability would be someone making around ~30,000pg /year ($420,000/$13.50). Of course, the brewer liability is based on the lower tax rate for small brewers. The same line of logic might drastically increase the distillers that qualify if a lower small distillers tax rate was created. With this thinking it may be wise to wait to see how far that piece of legislation goes. Brent Brent Ryan Newport Distilling Company Newport, RI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now