Jump to content
ADI Forums
KRS

Organic distilled spirits means exactly what?

Recommended Posts

Can anyone provide scientifically valid information about the value of using organic ingredients to make distilled spirits?  It seems to me to be totally unnecessary and possibly a deceptive marketing ploy.  What does organic mean for the resulting chemical compounds of spirits?  Once they're converted to ethanol, what chemical compounds of the original ingredients remain that can distinguish organic from non-organic?  Spirits are all non-organic chemically!  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The main reason to brand "certified organic" is to cater for those customers who wish to pay more to make them feel better for being more "natural" etc etc.

All spirits are "organic" 

Ethanol C2H5OH is an organic compound, so I was told when I studied organic chemistry at university many years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By being "certified organic" the customer should be confident that there are no pesticides or other "artificial" nasties in their drug :rolleyes:(ethanol) that they are consuming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For a distilled product (and probably many other products as well) being organic does not (in my opinion at least) affect the final product itself; but many people would argue that the process used to create an organic product is more environmentally friendly and as such adds value to the product even though it may be indistinguishable from a non-organic product.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given that recent studies have shown that eating organic does nothing from stopping greenhouse gases in any meaningful way and that many 'organic' products do use a variety of chemicals as part of the production process, I would argue that organic is simply a modern marketing ploy. Kinda like 'gluten free' Just because you use barley dosen't mean gluten is in the finished product. I try to explain the chemistry to my clients and they always say, 'well if it's made from wheat it has gluten in it. The end. So we want potato vodka instead." OK whatever. I would be more interested in supporting a local farmer that is not organic but cares for this crop and it's quality over lip service about how organic it is. Not saying organic is bad, I'd just rather save it for the broccoli.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, all.  I did bloop regarding ethanol being inorganic.  It is a carbon hydroxyl.  However, when it's distilled, the carbon mostly converts to carbon dioxide and escapes into the air.  Pete B is being factious, right?  I really do need to consult a chemist about the possibilities of pesticides harmful to humans remain in the distilled ethanol.  A number of clear spirits have fruits and other raw ingredients added.  Those additives possibly could have pesticide residue harmful to humans.  It's worth finding out.  Maybe organic matters in wine and beer.  I remain sceptical that it's anything other than marketing when spirits are "organic."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, KRS said:

.........  However, when it's distilled, the carbon mostly converts to carbon dioxide and escapes into the air.  Pete B is being factious, right? 

If you set fire to ethanol its carbon will turn to carbon dioxide but if you run ethanol through a still then it remains as ethanol, no carbon released.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, KRS said:

...................  I really do need to consult a chemist about the possibilities of pesticides harmful to humans remain in the distilled ethanol. .......................

No harm in trying to find out but in the end there are some customers who just won't believe in science.

"the customer is always right"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

interesting stuff this is . my brother in law is an organic farmer and he spends half his time burning dzl fuel working summerfallow to kill weeds only to combine next years crop and spread them back out across the field again . and he thinks this is good for the environment lol . organic products have taken a huge loss in popularity once nonorganic producers started using the label naturally , most consumers dont know the difference between naturally and organic lol .

personally when i look at 4 dollar a bushel malt barley grown conventionally or 7 dollar a bushel organic malt barley the choice is clear . ...but like pete said the customer is always right , so the next big question ,,,is there enough customers that care to justify the cost difference and are they willing to pay up for there choice . i think not but who knows . 

what percentage of successful marketing is product and what percent is bull shit ..... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Compare your lab work to organic and see what chemicals from farming come through with your distillate.... I know not everyone agrees, but we believe that organic farming to feed the earth is not a sustainable long term solution, but that it does have merit in terms of distillate mash for flavor as well as chemical composition. Flavor wise: maybe not so much in a sweet corn mash which we don't cook anyways, but using organic heritage corn over Briess commercial gives us better flavor in our Rye (R, C, M) and Bourbon Mashes (C, W, M).

 

Edit: And Organic Certified Spirits means a distillery uses certified source for organic grains, in a certified organic facility using an organic process. If you deviate form one of those three, a spirit is not certified organic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We're a certified organic distillery, so I can answer this one.  The main benefit is that it's better for the environment overall.  Perhaps in a refined finished product like distilled spirits, you might not worry as much about directly consuming residual poisons, herbicides, pesticides, synthetic fertilizers, genetically engineered biochemicals, irradiated materials, etc.  However if it's still an appropriate option if you'd prefer to reduce all of those in the world you live in.

Let's say you're a fisherman in the Gulf of Mexico that enjoys bourbon made from Midwestern corn.  You also know from first hand experience that the Dead Zone is bigger than ever and affecting your livelihood.  Perhaps that might have some influence on your consumer product choices?

  • reaction_title_1 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I read your response, I did think there was some condescension in the tone, but I can see how you might think I owe you one for calling organic spirits a “marketing ploy.”  Sane people all care about the earth and what we’re doing to it.  I count myself among them.

The methane from livestock production is one of the biggest causes of global warming, which indicates the benefits to Mother Earth of a vegetarian-heavy diet.  Which then brings with it the issue of pesticides.  That’s a hard one.  The government has declared that what is used commercially at this time leaves only harmless residue, which might be true, considering how many Americans eat non-organic crops and live to a hearty age. 

It’s not true for field workers, however, unless their employers follow strict guidelines for crop spraying.  Not enough do, as I can attest.  I was an infant development specialist who worked with many developmentally disabled children born to field workers.  I wouldn’t eat Fresh and Easy produce, grown in the area where I worked, unless death was imminent and I was hungry. 

Irradiation of food does not make food radioactive any more than we are left radioactive by dental x-rays.  There is no credible research that indicates a molecular change in human beings or animals that consume GMO crops, and I don’t merely reference government findings.  Further, the use of irradiation in no way relieves food producers of the obligation to follow strict sanitation standards, although, as with most regulations, some people don’t.  Putting them out of business is a worthwhile endeavor. 

Finally, GMOs.  I’m sure you know that gene modification therapy has helped a great many human beings avoid or recover from debilitating conditions.  If it’s okay for them, it’s okay for field crops and the people and animals that consume them.

What I want is truth in advertising from spirit producers who label their products “organic.” A disclaimer would be honest—and we all care about being considered honest, don’t we?

“The organic raw materials that were used to manufacture this spirit beverage have no more effect on the spirit produced than non-organic raw materials.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pete B:  A preference for alternative facts seems to becoming endemic.  We need truth in advertising beyond the dangers of alcohol on our bottles.  Implied benefits need to be clarified.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/8/2017 at 3:58 AM, Hudson bay distillers said:

interesting stuff this is . my brother in law is an organic farmer and he spends half his time burning dzl fuel working summerfallow to kill weeds only to combine next years crop and spread them back out across the field again . and he thinks this is good for the environment lol . organic products have taken a huge loss in popularity once nonorganic producers started using the label naturally , most consumers dont know the difference between naturally and organic lol .

personally when i look at 4 dollar a bushel malt barley grown conventionally or 7 dollar a bushel organic malt barley the choice is clear . ...but like pete said the customer is always right , so the next big question ,,,is there enough customers that care to justify the cost difference and are they willing to pay up for there choice . i think not but who knows . 

what percentage of successful marketing is product and what percent is bull shit ..... 

That's cause he's doing it wrong.  Switch to no-till and stop burning the earth.  The burning method is dumb at best - it kills all the microbes leaving the ground in a worst state than using glyphosate (which really is rather benign in comparison to popular herbicides and pesticides).   At the least switch to using a citric acid herbicide.

To the OP - I think you know this already,  but organic is not and should not be explicitly about the end product.  It's not unlike the reasoning behind clothing companies telling people you don't use sweat shops.  It's a method of telling the consumer that you are at least trying to do the right thing through-and-through.  Another straight comparison is when buildings/companies advertise their LEED rating.  Is there really an immediate biological benefit to the consumer? Probably not, but they can feel confident that their money is going in the hands of someone that Captain Planet might be proud of. 

Point is  "organic" used to imply a holistic growth environment as a reaction to heavily industrialized (in both mechanics and chemicals) farming.  Over time, people realized that they can use non-holistic practices that still fit within the legal definition of "organic" regardless of whether or not it was a sound, environmentally responsible manner.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/12/2017 at 6:50 PM, KRS said:

What I want is truth in advertising from spirit producers who label their products “organic.” A disclaimer would be honest—and we all care about being considered honest, don’t we?

Fortunately for you and consumers, the term organic is already explicitly defined by Federal law, so there is no ambiguity about what it means and no further explanation or disclaimers should be necessary.  Compliance is also strictly enforced with detailed recorded keeping and annual inspections by an accredited certifying agency:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/grades-standards/organic-standards
 

On 12/12/2017 at 6:50 PM, KRS said:

Irradiation of food does not make food radioactive any more than we are left radioactive by dental x-rays...

I'm not sure how widely irradiated agricultural products are actually being used by distilleries, but this is still a decent example of thinking beyond the individual consumer.  I believe there is evidence that irradiated food can be chemically altered and may reduce nutritional content.  However if we accept your assumption that the finished product is perfectly safe and unaltered, should that make it acceptable to the consumer?  For many consumers it does still matter.  You can't have irradiated products without an irradiation facility.  What kind of radioactive materials do they use, and what's the risk of contamination to the environment?  Do they generate radioactively contaminated waste?  Would you mind if they opened a facility in your neighborhood?  If not, how far away is acceptable?  Would you have any concerns if they transported their waste products down your street on the way to dumping it at your local landfill?  How many years will it stay hazardous?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Irradiation is done with microwaves.

The definition of organic is not the issue.  The issue is labeling a bottle of spirits "organic."  The spirit is not organic--the ingredients used to make it were produced with organic methods.  The resulting spirit is not superior to a spirit produced with non-organic ingredients.  Irradiation, "organic spirits," etc, are misleading in terms of the benefits or detriments.  Because people want it, doesn't make the customer right.  Ignorance is just as endemic as alternative facts--undoubtedly linked to each other.  Additionally, many farmers produce "pesticide free," which means exactly that, but don't go through the difficult process of getting their "organic" designation.  Are the farms in their vicinity spraying madly, spewing into the atmosphere where they infiltrate the "pesticide free" crops?  Possibly.  I do think making the effort to produce crops and raise livestock in ways that limit the detriment to our earth is admirable.  I don't think those who make the effort have the right to imply that it's a superior method that results in a superior product when it's not.  People are being tricked into believing that they are getting a benefit from the product itself, not that purchasing the product is one more for Mother Earth although not intrinsically different from any other spirit they could have bought.   I do believe I'm getting too annoyed about the fact that the central issue  has not been addressed by the distillers that use organically produced ingredients.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, KRS said:

Irradiation is done with microwaves.

The definition of organic is not the issue.  The issue is labeling a bottle of spirits "organic."  The spirit is not organic--the ingredients used to make it were produced with organic methods.  The resulting spirit is not superior to a spirit produced with non-organic ingredients.  Irradiation, "organic spirits," etc, are misleading in terms of the benefits or detriments.  Because people want it, doesn't make the customer right.  Ignorance is just as endemic as alternative facts--undoubtedly linked to each other.  Additionally, many farmers produce "pesticide free," which means exactly that, but don't go through the difficult process of getting their "organic" designation.  Are the farms in their vicinity spraying madly, spewing into the atmosphere where they infiltrate the "pesticide free" crops?  Possibly.  I do think making the effort to produce crops and raise livestock in ways that limit the detriment to our earth is admirable.  I don't think those who make the effort have the right to imply that it's a superior method that results in a superior product when it's not.  People are being tricked into believing that they are getting a benefit from the product itself, not that purchasing the product is one more for Mother Earth although not intrinsically different from any other spirit they could have bought.   I do believe I'm getting too annoyed about the fact that the central issue  has not been addressed by the distillers that use organically produced ingredients.  

Good to know i cant label my product "organic" thanks for the info and i guess time to get my labels re printed. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't legal?  I believe I've seen it.  Maybe I'm confusing it with wine.  I'll check.  When you do change your labels, consider the honesty of adding the fact that there's no difference between s made from organic ingredients and spirits not made from organic ingredients.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is it not legal? Im organic certified, i get inspected yearly and best i can tell no one is tossing me in jail.    So your saying a there is no difference between an organic certified candy bar and a regular candy bar? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×