I understand the Brown-Forman argument, we can't get it (at least at a competitive price), so why use it?
It seems like GMO crops are banned in some 26 countries including Europe, Russia and China (of all places) among other places (see list below), maybe they are on to something? Shouldn't non-GMO for crop production be the standard? Assuming they find that GMO crops do have some life-shortening or other characteristics, do you really want to have a barrel house full of the stuff? I would think of buying organic as 1) offering a deciphering consumer a choice 2) insurance against someone finding a problem when enough time has passed for adequate research to be done (the delayed research to learn more about asbestos and radon gas in homes come to mind)...that's just the other side of the argument that I see.
Since when has big business been an advocate for change, especially ones with a vested interest of increased profits (not having to buy more expensive ingredients) & tens of thousands of gallons of GMO spirits aging? If companies like Brown-Forman made it a priority to source Organic or Non-GMO ingredients, then maybe family farmers would plant more of them? They are basically taking no responsibility, its the farmers and the consumers, not us...that boiler plate paragraph seems like a great cop-out though...an effective way to play both sides of our discussion here. If consumers wake up like Europe and China, we might change our practices, if not, why change the status quo?
Countries not allowing GMOs--Switzerland, Australia, Austria, China, India, France, Germany, Hungary, Luxembourg, Greece, Bulgaria, Poland, Italy, Mexico and Russia.
A decent article worth a look:
https://www.alcoholprofessor.com/blog/2014/06/18/omg-these-gmos/