Patio29Dadio Posted May 18, 2018 Share Posted May 18, 2018 Denver Distiller - Thanks. Get your points related to the fact that this NOT beer making with a boil. But going back to read his mash protocol, my thought was that he was depleted of 02 and getting a stuck lag phase. Or he could pitch at a higher rate? Your point I think here is that he needs to get to fermentation ASAP... and so a shorter lag phase would be preferable. Makes sense. I know that I have had some bourbon mash fermentation problems with butryc acid hits that seemed to be remedied with a shot of O2 in the mash before the pitch. But I also upped my pitching rate at the same time.... breaking my rule to control change variables given the interest to prevent having to discard another bad mash run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltySpirits Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 Bringing this back to life due to running into similar troubles. Were you ever able to figure it out @Tim-o-tee? Edit: Seems like he hasn't been on in awhile. @Southernhighlander, do you know if he solved his problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevea Posted May 11, 2019 Share Posted May 11, 2019 Reading this (now dated) tale of woe leads me to a few thoughts. The off-flavor was never identified with enough specificity. "Skunky" suggests sulfur compounds, Tim-O-Tees description sounded more like a classical phenolic flavor, acrolein in quantity would certainly be off-putting but unlikely to be described as either "skunky" or "band-aid", 4-VG & 4-VP are phenolics, and in quantity may suggest "band-aid", but there are other phenolic compounds that would sooner cause such flavors. Then there is the long & circular discussion of infection, which are not well evidenced. A half hour with a microscope & a gas-chromatograph would be definitive wrt to these theories. I am inclined to accept Tim's description of phenolic/band-aid flavor. The chances that bacterial infections are so prevalent as to create this flavor reliably despite acceptable sanitation and pitching rates is difficult to accept. Needs labwork, not guesswork. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim-o-tee Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 Thank you for the insights everyone. I have not yet eliminated this "problem" but have seemed to be able to minimize it somewhat. Stevea- Assuming that these are phenolic compounds, what are some common scenarios that would produce these? I do use malted barley in most mashes but have experienced these flavors in all corn mashes as well. Is it strictly unwanted bacteria that would cause this or is there something happening to my yeast that would cause them to produce phenolics? Can something happen in the still that would do this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foreshot Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 Brettanomyces is characterized as phenolic - horsey, bandaids, etc. I'm not saying it is, only that it is a possibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silk City Distillers Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 Second brett as being a negative phenolic contributor. I think it's the 4-VP that's the major standout in distilled spirits, not so much 4-VG, but that's just my personal opinion. 4-VP is burnt plastic bandaids and bad hospital smell. 4-VG is more of a rye spice. However, do not discount POF+ yeasts, especially with high malt barley and wheat mash bills (high ferulic acid). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2050-0416.1996.tb00918.x A good primer is to look at the processes to emphasize phenolics/clove in Wheat Beers, and don't do anything they tell you to do. I think ultimately, the easy answer for distillers, is to mash in malt at a higher temperature than you might be comfortable with, and utilize exogenous enzyme to ensure complete conversion, combined with a lower fermentation temperature. Don't add malt or wheat as an adjunct before cereal mashing/gelatinization of corn (some do this for the enzyme). Also experiment with unmalted wheat, if you are using wheat, or really any unmalted adjunct. And try to stay away from POF+ yeast (finding out if your strain is POF+ or - may not be easy) - but if you are playing with beer yeast, specifically ale or hefe, it's there. Back to the Brett - it creates the volatile phenolic flavors the same way that POF+ yeast does, so anything you do to minimize ferulic acid production is going to limit the phenols from a Brett infection as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim-o-tee Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 Very interesting stuff. Thank you very much Silk City. So does malted barley contain mostly alpha or beta amylase? Is it mainly used for liquification of mash or saccharification? AND... how do I kill Brett? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim-o-tee Posted June 7, 2019 Share Posted June 7, 2019 I guess a more appropriate question would be how do I manage Brett? What implications will increasing yeast pitch rate have? And on the malted barley subject, is there a temp that would be too high to add malt that would have negative effects on flavor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamOVD Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 Malt contains plenty of both alpha and beta amylase. Typically brewers and distillers use the temperature they rest the grain at to determine which is more active. I believe Silk is recommending mashing in hotter to reduce phenols from the malt. However, if you mash them in hotter you lose some Diastatic Power, because the beta amylase is being denatured faster at that higher temperature, so he is also recommending using added enzymes to complete the conversion. I'm sure Silk is much smarter than me though so I could be misunderstanding, but maybe a simpler interpretation from a dummy will help. As far as Brett goes. The idea is to keep it from growing in the first place. With a healthy ferment and a high pitch rate, the yeast very quickly lower the Ph and sugar available, and raise the alcohol %, making it a much less hospitable environment for bacteria. I believe Silk and Steve are talking about 3 different possible sources of phenols, one from your grains, one from your yeast, and one from a Brett infection. They can correct me if I'm wrong. I really feel for you if you're still tackling this a year later though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kleclerc77 Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 (edited) Bringing this one back from the dead. I'm getting a sulphur smell towards the end of my stripping runs off of this rye/wheat ferment. I am not surprised, as this mash/ferment went less than ideally. We got good conversion, however. My question is this: in polishing these low wines, should I be concerned about this sulphur smell bleeding into my hearts cut, or will it just mean a bigger, smellier tails cut? Thanks in advance folks 🤙 Edit: Any idea about this @Silk City Distillers ? Update: No foul odors came over to the polishing run. We have ample copper contact in our still that must've taken care of it. Edited September 15, 2019 by kleclerc77 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now