This seems like a topic that could be a "Pandora's box", but is valid. Does one differentiate between strict rectifiers and those that due to the constraints of space and capitol use GNS as "A clean slate" for re-distillation (I've heard that term used by a couple of guys)?
I've always believed that the market would root out inferior products but am a little cynical; i.e. the fact that there are only 6 major distilleries in the U.S. and all those different labels. Heaven Hill is the prime example.
With me though, I don't care that Henry McKenna single barrel comes from the same juice as Evan Williams. I care about which tastes better.
So with "Craft" distillers, I've found that those who are using their stills for temporary storage instead of as stills have products that are lacking in a decent flavor profile. The bigger picture to me is that the guys that mash their own grains are apt to make it known, and the public is becoming more aware of the process.
I guess what I'm saying is, or asking, how big of an issue is it if an industry in its infancy quarrels over semantics of "Craft", "Micro" or "Small"?
I do agree that it isn't right for people to lie or even be vague about their processes.