Jump to content

pressure9pa

Members
  • Posts

    115
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pressure9pa

  1. Sorry to hear this as I was following this thread closely. If you don't mind me asking, was the complexity of your design the root cause of the failure? If so, could you briefly describe it? Please don't feel pressured to share anything you wnat to keep confidential, but something as vague as "shape", "size", or "decoration" might be helpful to the group.

  2. LTC hit what my statement was supposed to convey. I wouldn't trust any gin or infusion to be a perfect replica either. If you're testing to see if you like an ingreedient, it's probably ok. If you're trying to scale X tablespoons at 3L to 100X tbl at 300L, you'll be in the ballpark but not exact.

  3. If I were in this situation, I would assume the same margins exist like a 3 tier system and then "pay myself" for being the distributor. For every dollar you get in selling a 750 mL bottle to a distributor, a bar will charge about $.62 for a single drink. They will pay about $1.62 for the bottle to a distributor, so I would plan on being around the same price. (You probably also inherited the state excise burden, which a distributor is now paying.)

  4. I would shoot for about 14%. Higher is possible, but it can stretch the yeast, and make the fermentation time noticably longer. The main variable is the yeast. If you're purchasing a yeast, I would get their input as well.

  5. Product is very important to this question. If it's barrel-aged for example, the volume is very important. If it's a vodka, less so. Infusions, gins, etc. figure somewhere between.

    Also, just because it doesn't scale up perfectly doesn't mean there's no value in the experiement. Something that's awful at 1 gallon won't be great at 100.

  6. This is an amateur brewing online resource that talks about the issues and has some very good calcuation

    guidelines.

    http://www.howtobrew...hapter15-1.html

    hunt thru the several chapters. John Palmer is a friend and the website gets high marks for accuracy, but

    the background details are quite simplified (it's for new brewers).

    Then keep in mind that we aren't making tasty-hoppped beer - we are making wash. So flavor issues like

    sulfate levels impacting hop flavor, of MgSO4 in excess creating sour/bitter taste is a 'don't care' for distillers

    except that you probably want to taste/sample the wash for problems.

    Good link Steve, thanks.

  7. Hope it works out for you. I hope to get back to the islands someday after a week vacation ten years ago which wasn't nearly long enough. ''Research'' might be a great excuse.

  8. I'm not sure who else, if anyone, acted on this post, but I've been very impressed with Sisyphus and Carl's knowledge of startups and their use of electronic marketing. They are quoting a package for me, but even if that doesn't work out I think I've learned quite a bit from our handful of conversations. I know must members of this forum are further along in the business than I am, but if there's anyone looking for a specific marketing plan or a quick overview of where they stand, I'd suggest giving Sisyphus a call. Carl wasn't at all pushy, and actually guided me in a direction that will require fewer resources than I originally anticipated.

  9. ...

    In short... maybe you can skip fire supression if your overal production strategy allows it - and your AHJ agrees. If you'd like, I'd be happy to share with you a documennt that I prepared to help local fire/building athorities understand how I was going to work within the code and not exceed the MAQ. Shoot me an email if you'd like more info from my dealings on the matter.

    Lenny,

    I just sent you an email. If it's still available, I'd like to see the document you reference above. Thanks in advance.

    Jeffery

×
×
  • Create New...