Jump to content

indyspirits

Members
  • Posts

    770
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

Posts posted by indyspirits

  1. We went with a smaller yamada with an aluminum air motor, stainless bits & pieces, and teflon seals & balls. Handily enough it came with an attached grounding strap. We paid about a grand on ebay after shipping. It was the NDP-20BST. Great little pump.   

    • Thanks 1
  2. 10 hours ago, Foreshot said:

    For starters, Taylor, doesn't need to be a douchebag. Second, the most valuable comment is:

    Quote

    A stale note of wet cardboard

    More than anything this tells me the tails cut went too deep.  If that is in fact the case (and god knows there are so many whiskey "experts" out there, Taylor evidently being one of them) then his other comments have merit. However, I have never, ever heard of "puddle water". That's him trying to be cute.  Reviews like this couldn't be less helpful. 

  3. 4 hours ago, UAHJoe said:

    Yeah our customer is definitely in the minority as far as "off the grain" distilling goes

    I dont know of a single large distiller that lauters except for single malt. Of those that do, 100% are direct immersion.  There's no value in lautering if you dont have to OR if the product quality suffers because of not doing it.

     

  4. I've always read:

    • Small barrels experience much greater loss than large
    • On the average and in the long run 53s lose 4% in year 1 and 2% per year thereafter

    That's not exactly what we're seeing. After two years we're seeing about 20% loss in 30 gallon barrels and 11% (both on a proof gallon basis) in 53 gallon barrels. These are Kelvin #3 char. Barrels are stored vertically, four to a pallet in the midwest. We do get some weeping through the bungs which stops after some time or with liberal whack from a dead-blow.   Our prod facility is not climate controlled and drops to 60F in winter and high in the upper 90s (with humidity to match -- yes, it can get oppressive) in the summer. 

    I'm displeased with this rate of loss. What are others seeing?

    Edit:Spelling

  5. 14 hours ago, adamOVD said:

    One more question, is it easier to keep the mash liquid by milling the grain coarser or finer?

    I find the entire process (gel / starch - > dextrines) is faster when the corn is ground finer. Never really noticed a difference regarding viscosity.  

    • Thumbs up 1
  6. 13 hours ago, delta H said:

    And yeah, mash can still be gummy at high temps,

    Funny story... We normally pitch our HTAs at low temps and them let the heat up with the corn. Once we forgot and when the starch gelled (185ish ?)  you could actually hear the difference in the agitator.  Pitch our normal HTAs and within a few seconds it started to thin out. OK, we thought it was funny.  

     

  7. 3 hours ago, Silk City Distillers said:

    I hear that many French Liqueurs use beet ethanol as the base.

    Do you know of any commercial vodkas that are from beet ethanol? Curious if I can tell the difference between those and corn / cane. I'm certain many of our first forays into distilling started with a bag of Domino sugar, bakers yeast,  garden fertilizer and a few multi-vitamins. To say the resulting spirit was anything but rough and twangy is a compliment. 

  8. 25 minutes ago, Hudson bay distillers said:

    ust curious if there was a way of figure out if the 70 points of sugar are all fermentable sugars . 

    Add glucoamylase and cleave the dextrins so they are fermentable?  

     

     

  9. 17 hours ago, Silk City Distillers said:

    beet molasses fermentation

    What exactly is beet molasses? I assume the "waste" from producing beet sugar but don't want to, well, assume.  I agree with you re: SR / RM. We too use RM in our unaged white rum.  SR is, well, uninteresting. Early on we did produce a sugar based neutral which initially suffered from that "sugar twang". Switching from EC1118 to SR cleaned that up a bit. We've since switched to corn.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...