First might be to organize a coalition that would want to push such an agenda. Would include existing small distillers of course, but that is a very small group. Add the likely new small distillers, such as existing breweries, brew pubs, and wineries; then add the agricultural producers that would care, such as small farmers that would grow source materials. Since our planned business model also focusses on using Michigan agricultural products for artisan distilling, we would certainly be on board. One has to also make the argument that the net increase in revenue due to the growth in total number and production of each small distillery, and indirect affect on agricultural economy, would significantly enhance the net tax revenue lost to the state from the reduction. For that, a simple economic study put together by the ag econ department of MSU, for example, would be necessary.
Derrick